����������� Racism, Anti-Semitism; What Are They?
During the Korean Police Action, 1950-53, a new word was introduced to the English language. It was �brainwashing.� Our enemies in Red China had a more descriptive term for it, they call it �thought control.� They introduced it to their people through a science called �Psychopolitics,� which is the
�art of controlling the thinking of an entire body of people, so that they will obey you without question.�
Some Christians immediately become �touchy� when we say �White Christian Civilization,� as though we meant that salvation does not apply to all. This is not our meaning! But if you are honest, you will have to admit, that only the White Nations have openly responded to the Gospel message. Colored nations have only been reached at great expense, effort and often danger.
For many centuries the West was Christendom and its White Civilization was indubitably Christian: that, whether you like it or not, is an historical fact.
Only the White nations have founded their constitutions on God�s Word; in them alone, is a day set aside for the worship of our God, and the rest of the body. A well-known atheist once said: �The strength of England can be found in their Sunday day of rest and worship.�
In recent years, in America in particular, there has been a plan underway in our educational system and the media, to make White People ashamed of being White. We are indoctrinated daily with a �guilt complex.� While it is perfectly acceptable for a Black to believe and preach that �Black is beautiful,� FOR A WHITE TO DO THE SAME WILL BRING CRIES OF �RACIST� FROM THE PRESS AND THE JUDEO- CHRISTIAN PULPITS OF AMERICA.
While it is considered proper for a Jew to talk about his Jewishness, and the lie about his �Chosen People� status, you are considered to be a �religious bigot,� if you believe the Truth, that the White People of Christendom, are the True Chosen People of the Book.
As the result of this strange �lopsided� thinking, and because most of us have been sloshed around in the �liberal mind-detergent� of our times. This is a mind cleaning detergent made up of one once of fact, dissolved in a gallon of hogwash or bs. We have seen a strange and very sad thing happen in America, as our White Boys and Girls are being taught to be ashamed of their heritage.
While I am not a �racial supremist,� (although I will be branded this and many things much worse, at least by some peoples thinking. But actually when they brand me with some name they think is bad, they are actually branding themselves as such, because if they were not what they were what they are calling me, the thought would never have entered their minds. So when one calls you a racist, neo-Nazi, anti-Semite and etc., remember they are the same thing and many times worse) I am a �racist� if believing in one�s own people and wanting to help them, makes one so. I go by these observable facts and many more:
1). Only our White People have openly accepted the Gospel and Christianity.
2). Only our White People have abolished slavery. England first in 1854, followed by the United States in 1865.
3). Our nations send out 98% of all Christian literature and missionaries.
4). Our White nations are the one�s which feed the world�s starving.
5). Our White nations are the one�s who send aid when there has been a great catastrophe.
6). It is only our White nations that have based their governments on God�s Laws.
If it makes you feel proud to see the accomplishments of the White Christian world, then according to the present �political� doctrine, you are a �racist or anti-Semitic!�
There is surely no nation in the world that holds �racism� and �Anti-Semitism� in greater horror than does the people in the United States. Compared to other kinds of offenses, it is thought to be somehow more reprehensible, than rape or murder - certainly more so than the murder of �innocent� unborn babies. The national media and public have become so used to tales of murder, rape, robbery, and arson, that any but the most spectacular crimes are shrugged off as part of the inevitable texture of American life.
However, �Racism� and �Anti-Semitism� are never shrugged off; for example, when a White Georgetown Law School Student reported in early 1995 that black students were not as qualified as White students, it set off a booming, national controversy about �racism.�
If the student had related some statement that the Jews would have considered �Anti-Semitic,� and anything or anyone that disagrees with them is labeled as such, or if they made the same statement the blacks would have considered them as �racist� the White student would have been crucified and discharged from the school. Or if the student had merely murdered someone he would have attracted far less attention and criticism.
Racism is, indeed, the national obsession. Universities are on full alert for it; newspapers and politicians denounce it; churches preach against it; yet America is said to be racked with it, but just what is racism? Dictionaries are not much help in understanding what is meant by the word.
They usually define it as the belief that one�s own ethnic stock is superior to others, or as the belief that culture and behavior are rooted in race. When Americans speak of racism they mean a great deal more than this.
Nevertheless, the dictionary definition of racism is a clue to understanding what Americans do mean. A peculiarly American meaning derives from the current dogma that all ethnic stocks are equal; despite clear evidence to the contrary. All races have been declared to be equally talented and hard-working, and anyone who questions the dogma is thought to be not merely wrong but evil.
The dogma has logical consequences that are profoundly important; if blacks, for example, are equal to Whites in every way - what accounts for their poverty, criminality, moral degeneracy and dissipation? Since any theory of racial differences has been outlawed, the only possible explanation for black failure is White Racism. And since blacks are markedly poor, crime-prone, and dissipated, America must be raced with pervasive racism. Nothing else could be keeping them in such an abject state.
All public discourse on race today is locked into this rigid logic and any explanation for black failure that does not depend on White Wickedness threatens to veer off into the forbidden territory of racial differences. Thus, even if today�s Whites can find in their hearts no desire to oppress blacks, yesterday�s Whites must have oppressed them.
If Whites do not consciously oppress blacks, they must oppress them unconsciously, if no obviously racist individuals can be identified, then social institutions must be racist. Or, since blacks are failing so terribly in America there simply must be millions of White People we do not know about, who are working day and night to keep blacks in misery. The dogma of racial equality leaves no room for an explanation of black failure that is not, in some fashion, an indictment of White People.
The logical consequences of this are clear; since we are �required� to believe that the only explanation for non-White failure is White racism, every time a non-White is poor, commits a crime, goes on welfare, or takes drugs, White Society stands accused of yet another act of racism. All failure or misbehavior by non-Whites is standing proof that White society is riddled with hatred and bigotry. For precisely so long as non-Whites fail to succeed in life at exactly the same level as Whites, Whites will be, by definition, thwarting and oppressing them.
This obligatory pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions:
FIRST: Racism is a sin that is thought to be committed, almost, exclusively by White People. Indeed, a black congressman from Chicago, Gus Savage, and Coleman Young, the black mayor of Detroit, have argued that only White People can be racist. Like wise in 1987, the affirmative action officer of the State Insurance Fund of New York issued a company pamphlet in which she explained that ALL Whites are racist and that ONLY Whites can be racist. How else could the plight of blacks be explained without flirting with the possibility of racial inequality?
Although some blacks and liberal Whites concede that non-Whites can, perhaps, be racist they invariably add that non-Whites have been forced into it as self-defense because of centuries of White oppression. What appears to be non-White racism is so understandable and forgivable that it hardly deserves the name. Thus, whether or not an act is called racism depends on the race of the racist. What would surely be called racism when done by Whites is thought to be normal when done by anyone else. The reverse is also true.
Examples of this sort of double standard are so common, it is almost tedious to list them: When a White man kills a black man and uses the word �nigger� while doing so, there is an enormous media uproar and the nation beats its collective breast; but when members of the Black Yahweh cult carry out ritual murders of random Whites, the media and the Judeo-Christian pulpits are silent.
College campuses forbid pejorative statements about non-Whites as �racist,� but ignore scurrilous attacks on Whites. At election time, if 60 percent of the White voters vote for a White candidate, and 95 percent of the black voters vote for a black opponent, it is Whites who are accused of racial bias.
There are 107 �historically black� colleges, whose fundamental blackness must be preserved in the name of diversity, but all historically White colleges must be forcibly integrated in the name of...the same thing. To resist would be racist.
�Black Pride� is said to be a wonderful and worthy thing, but anything that could be construed as an expression of White Pride is a form of hatred. It is perfectly natural for third-world immigrants to expect school instruction and driver�s tests in their own languages, whereas for native Americans to ask them to learn English is racist.
BLATANT ANTI-WHITE PREJUDICE, IN THE FORM OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, IS NOW THE LAW OF THE LAND (Folks remember when you lose you job to a black or some other minority, that it is because that minority person is incapable of competing in a world with white people, so the government has to give them preferential treatment; so that the white race will not recognize just how incompetent they really are); and anything remotely like affirmative action, if practiced in favor of Whites, would be attacked as despicable favoritism. All across the country, black, Hispanic and Asian clubs and caucuses are thought to be fine expressions of ethnic solidarity, but any club or association expressly for Whites is by definition racist.
The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) campaigns openly for black advantage but is a respected �civil rights� organization. The National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) campaigns merely for equal treatment of all races, but is said to be viciously racist and Anti-Semitic.
At a few college campuses, students opposed to affirmative action laws have set up student unions for White, analogous to those for blacks, Hispanics, Jews, and etc., and have been roundly condemned as racists. Recently, when the White students at Lowell High School in San Francisco found themselves to be a minority, they asked for a racially exclusive club like the ones that non-Whites have. They were turned down in horror. Indeed, in America today, any club not specifically formed to be a White enclave but whose members simply happen all to be white is branded as racist or Anti-Semitic.
Today, one of the favorite slogans that define the asymmetric quality of American racism is �celebration of diversity.� It has begun to dawn on a few people that �diversity� is always achieved at the expense of White (AND MOST OF THE TIME WHITE MEN), and never the other way around. No one proposes that Howard University be made more diverse by admitting Whites, Hispanics, or Asians.
No one ever suggests that National Hispanic University in San Jose, California would benefit from the diversity of having non-Hispanics on campus. No one suggests that the Black Congressional Caucus or the executive ranks of the NAACP or the Mexican-American Legal Defense and Educational Fund suffer from a lack of diversity.
Somehow, it is perfectly legitimate for them to celebrate �homogeneity.� And yet any all-White group, a company, a town, a school, a club, a neighborhood, is thought to suffer from a crippling lack of diversity that must be remedied as quickly as possibly. Only when Whites have been reduced to a minority has �diversity� been achieved.
Let us put it bluntly. To �celebrate� or �embrace� diversity, as we are so often asked to so, is no different from �deploring an excess of Whites.� In fact, the entire nation is thought to suffer from an excess of Whites. Our current immigration policies are structured so that approximately 90 percent of our annual 800,000 legal immigrants are non-White. The several million illegal immigrants that enter the country every year are virtually all non-White. It would be racist not to be grateful for this laudable contribution to �diversity.� It is, of course, only White nations that are called upon to practice this kind of �diversity.� It is almost criminal to imagine a nation of any other race countenancing blatant dispossession of this kind.
What if the people in the United States were pouring its poorest, least educated and most criminal elements across the border into Mexico? Could anyone be fooled into thinking that Mexico was being �culturally enriched?� What if the state of Chihuahua were losing its majority population to poor Whites who demanded that schools be taught in English, who insisted on celebrating the Fourth of July, who demanded the right to vote even if they weren�t citizens, who clamored for �affirmative action� in jobs and schooling?
Would Mexico, or any other non-White nation tolerate this kind of cultural and demographic depredation? Of course not. Yet White Americans are supposed to look upon the flood of Hispanics and Asians entering their country as a priceless cultural gift. They are supposed to �celebrate� their own loss of influence, their own dwindling numbers, their own dispossession, for to do otherwise would be hopelessly racist.
There is another curious asymmetry about American racism. When non-Whites advance their own racial purposes, no one ever accuses them of �hating� another group. Blacks and Jews can join �civil rights� groups and Hispanics can be activists without fear of being branded as bigots and hate mongers. They can agitate openly for racial preferences that can come only at the expense of Whites. They can demand preferential treatment of all kinds without anyone ever suggesting that they are �anti-White.�
Whites, on the other hand, need only express their opposition to affirmative action to be called haters. They need only subject racial policies that are clearly prejudicial to themselves to be called racists. Should they actually go so far as to say that they prefer the company of their own kind, that they wish to be left alone to enjoy the fruits of their European heritage, they are irredeemably wicked and hateful.
Here, then is the final, baffling inconsistency about American race relations: All non-Whites are allowed to prefer the company of their own kind, to think of themselves as groups with interests distinct from those of the whole, and to work openly or group advantage. None of this is thought to be racist. At the same time, �Whites� must �also� champion the racial interests of non-Whites.
They must sacrifice their own future on the altar of �diversity� and cooperate in their own dispossession. They are to encourage, even to subsidize, the displacement of a European people and culture by alien peoples and cultures. To put it in the simplest possible terms, White people are cheerfully to slaughter their own society, to commit racial and cultural suicide. To refuse to do so would be racism.
Of course, the entire non-White enterprise in the United States is perfectly natural and healthy. Nothing could be more natural than to love one�s people and to hope that it should flourish. Filipinos and El Salvadorans are doubtless astonished to discover that simply by setting foot in the United States they are entitled to affirmative action preferences over native-born Whites, but can they be blamed for accepting them?
Is it surprising that they should want their languages, their cultures, their brothers and sisters to take possession and put their mark indelibly on the land? If the once-great people of a once-great nation is bent upon self-destruction and is prepared to hand over land and power to whomever shows up and asks for it, why should Mexican, Blacks, Jews and etc., complain?
No, it is the White enterprise in the united States that is unnatural, unhealthy, and without historical precedent. Whites have let themselves be convinced that it is racist merely to object to dispossession, they have allowed themselves to be convinced that it is natural for their sons and daughters to marry a black, Jew or any other race, other than their own, that it is racist to work for their own interests.
Never in the history of the world has a dominant people thrown open the gates to strangers, and poured out its wealth to aliens. Never before has a people been fooled into thinking that there was virtue or nobility in surrendering its heritage, and giving away to others its place in history. Because they knew that to do such would destroy their country and people.
Of all the races in America, only Whites have been tricked into thinking that a preference for one�s own kind is racism. Only Whites are ever told that a love for their own people is somehow �hatred� of others. All healthy people prefer the company of their own kind, and it has nothing to do with hatred.
All men love their families more than their neighbors, but this does not mean that they hate their neighbors. Whites who love their racial family need bear no ill will towards non-Whites. They only wish to be left alone to participate in the unfolding of their racial and cultural destinies.
What Whites in America are being asked to do is, therefore, is utterly unnatural; they are being asked to devote themselves to the interests of other races and to ignore the interests of their own kind. This is like asking a man to forsake his own children and love the children of his neighbors, since to do otherwise would be �racist.�
What then, is �racism?� It is considerably more than any dictionary is likely to say. It is any opposition y Whites to official policies of racial preference for non-Whites. It is any preference by Whites for their own people and culture. It is resistance by Whites to the idea of becoming a minority people. It is any unwillingness to be pushed aside. It is, in short, any of the normal aspirations of people-hood that have defined nations since the beginning of history; but only so long as the aspirations are those of Whites.
These same anti-Christ�s are at work in America, striving mightily to destroy the freedoms our forefathers fought and died for and we might add the freedom the blacks and Jews have enjoyed over the years also. While many intellectuals sneer at the idea of a conspiracy going on now, they will admit there have been many conspiracies in history. But it won�t happen here!
The nations of Christendom are unique among all other nations of the world, because their laws are based on the premises that there are certain �God given right� which are outside the scope of governmental control. Since these rights come from God Himself, they are known as �inalienable right.� Government may not tamper with these in any way, shape or form.
There are four major rights we have in America, which form the foundation of our Constitutional government:
1). The RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, as found in the Second Amendment. A freedman has always had the �God given right� to protect himself, his family and his property from the depredations of evil men, whether they be �run of the mill� criminals, or a criminal government which seeks to run roughshod over the rights of it�s people.
The government criminal, acting within the protection of the Law, may be more of a danger to you than the man who seeks to break into your house and rob you of your belongings. This is the principal reason this Amendment was included in the Constitution.
It was not for the rights of a man to hunt, or have gun for target practice, but as a �last ditch stand� of the Freedman against a government which has run amok. Our Founding Fathers stated that if the time ever came, when our government began to take away our God given rights, then it became not only our Right, but our Duty to throw out that government and install one which would protect the rights of it�s citizens.
2). The RIGHT OF WORSHIP WITHOUT STATE CONTROL. This country was never meant to be a �pluralistic society.� it was set up as a Christian country, to protect the rights of Christians to worship God according to the dictates of their conscience. The documents which founded every state prove this! Many of them specifically state that they were formed: �For the glory of God and the propagation of the Christian faith.� Other religions have obtained freedom under our system.
3). The FREEDOM OF SPEECH, PRESS and ASSEMBLY, and last, but not least;
4). The RIGHT TO OWN PROPERTY.
There are many others, some incorporated in the Bill of Rights, but these four are the cornerstones on which the foundation of America was laid. These were the rights our forefathers demanded from the tyrannical King John of England, when on a foggy day in the year 1214, at Runnymeade, England, the British freedmen, sword in hand, forced the king to sign a document called the Magna Carta. They did not do this on bended knee, but stood �SWORD IN HAND� and demanded their God given rights.
Since that time, the nations of Christendom have been unique in their concept of freedom. We must remember that Freedom is a fragile thing at best. Benjamin Franklin, the senior statesman of America once stated: �He who values security more than his freedom, deserves neither.�
Our Christian people for the most part, have forgotten this advice in these �latter days.� The abortion issue is a good example. We have well meaning people in America, who cry great crocodile tears over the fate of baby seals in Newfoundland, yet see nothing wrong with the murder of 2-million unborn babies every year by abortion.
Entire communities come together to rescue a few whales trapped in the ice, and spend millions to free them, while others cheer from the sidelines. Yet the feeling of millions of young Americans, including many Christians, can be summed up in the words of a beautiful co-ed at Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, who asked: �If we can�t have abortions and contraceptives, how will we handle the population explosion.�
When asked if she had ever heard of such a thing as �self-control,� one would have thought from the crowd reaction, that she had been slapped in the face. There were about 800 young Americans, ready to make their way into adulthood, who did not know that they had �freedom of choice� to decide whether they wanted to do �good� or �evil.� They had been taught by Satanic teachers and everything they did was conditioned by their environment, and that they had no moral choice. How sad, and how terrible will be God�s punishment on those who have taught them these falsehoods.
LATER, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE YOUNG WOMAN WHO HAD ASKED THE QUESTION WAS HEAD OF A COMMITTEE DEDICATED TO SAVING BABY SEALS, YET SHE COULD SEE NOTHING WRONG IN THE MURDER OF UNBORN BABIES IN THE ABORTION MURDER MILLS OF AMERICA. She had been taught that it was a woman�s right to control her own body, even if it meant breaking one of God�s major Laws. �Thou shalt not commit murder!�
Many Americans will take a stand for some �pet right� and ignore others. This is extremely dangerous. All our freedoms are so intricately woven together into the fabric of our well-being, that if we neglect one, a deterioration process begins, which in time will destroy all of them.
This principle was understood by a well-known America patriot named Davy Crockett, who in 1833, took a military force of Tennesseans on a thousand mile cross-country trek to fight at the Alamo. when they arrived, the Texicans said:
�Davy, why did you come? This isn�t your fight!�
And Crockett said:
�I�ve made it my fight!�
Why? Because he knew that if freedom was destroyed in Texas, it would only be a matter of time until it was destroyed in Tennessee. The same is true in 1995. If we allow the enemy to destroy South Africa, and in this case the enemy is our Shadow Government, the same force will in time destroy America, using the same methods. If the Shadow government can take away the right of parents in Nebraska to �home school� their children, they can do it wherever you are.
Whenever government forgets the true meaning of government, which makes it the �servant of the people,� it becomes a terrible monster. Like �fire,� it can be a blessing when it is under control, but a frightful monster when there is no control.
In America today, we are under attack from foreign, anti-Christ forces, headed by such organizations as the Anti-Defamation League, of the Jewish B�nai B�rith, which is an unlicenced agent of a foreign country (The Israeli government), that has been operating illegally on America soil, with government approval.
They have become the official advisor of our Justice Department in their dealing with Christian Patriots and for all practical purposes run our State Department and CIA in their handling of foreign affairs. Yet they have shown they will throw their brother and sister Jews to the wolves if they can gain more power, political control or money; THE ADL CARES NOTHING FOR AMERICAN JEWS, THEY ARE TO ALL SUBSERVENT TO A FOREIGN GOVERHMENT WHICH HAS CLEARLY SHOWN ITS CONTEMPT FOR THE AVERAGE AMERICAN JEW! BUT THE AVERAGE AMERICAN JEW CONTINUES, LIKE THE FOOL HE OR SHE IS, TO SUPPORT THE ONES THAT HATE THEM AS MUCH AS ANY OTHER PEOPLE ON EARTH, THE ZIONISTS.
When you read in the media, which is controlled by this same foreign, anti-Christ power, that the government is taking action against some Christian Patriot, or group of patriots, invariably you will see some statement from �Abie of the ADL.� Look and See for Yourself! These are the people who have set up laws forbidding �para-military� training, while carrying out this same training in at least seventeen states free from government harassment. Let a group of Christian Patriot attempt to do this and see what happens!
But such is the strength of this alien enemy in the halls of our Congress and in the Judaized and subverted Judeo-Christian churches of America, that our leaders are afraid to stand up and fight against them, for it is the �kiss of death� to any politician, or pastor who has the courage to resist them.
The reason our British forefathers put such rigid controls on King John, 775 years ago and then continued them in their Constitutions, was that they were not only Statesmen, they were also Historians. They realized that history proves that governments left to themselves, always seek control over its citizens, under the guidance of unscrupulous men who will gain by it!
The founders of our government took steps to protect the rights of Americans against such a government, in the remarkable document we call the Bill of Rights. It should and could be rightfully be called a Bill of Limitations, for that is what it is supposed to do to government.
The first nine amendments say in essence to big government: �Thou shalt not! Thou shalt not! Thou shalt not!� Then the Tenth Amendment, says it all by saying in essence: �Government, if there is anything we forgot in the first nine Amendments, you can�t do that either, without the permission of the people.�
By following these principles we have remained relatively free for over 200 years. But now, evil men in the government and a group in Congress known as the M.C.P.L. Members of Congress for Peace Through (World) Law, are pushing one agenda; One World Government.
Remember, that all these men have taken an oath of office to protect and defend our Constitution against ALL enemies, both foreign and domestic and they have not done this. To all intents and purposes, according to the definition of our Constitution, Article III, Section 3, they are TRAITORS! And should be dealt with accordingly!
Have you ever wondered why the 2nd Amendment, the Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms, is under perennial attack? It is because this Amendment is the foundation of ALL of our freedoms. The great International Lawyer, Frederick Bastiat, in his book �The Law,� states: �Each of us has the natural right, from God, to defend his person, his liberty and his property. These are the three basic requirements of life; the preservation of any one of them, is dependent on the preservations of the other two.�
Civilization has been based on this premise for the past 6,000 years of written history. Once the right of a freedman to protect himself, his family and his property against anyone is taken away, he becomes a slave! Even the Scriptures tell us: �But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.� [1]
The Communist Lenin knew this when he stated: �A system of licensing and registration of firearms is the perfect device to deny gun ownership to the bourgeois.�One thing the �free world� should have learned a long time ago, is that you can�t play �patty cake� with a rattlesnake without getting bit! We have in America, many people who are either so �naive� or �brainwashed� that they believe if all tiger hunters would hang up their guns, the big cats would turn into vegetarians over night.
But here is a fact of life, they refuse to face. No matter whether you view a tiger as a �pussy cat� or a �beautiful animal,� he is still a tiger. His tiger appetite for flesh and blood is as much a part of his tiger nature, as his stripes and when you live in a district where �man-eating� tigers roam, sensible people go armed!
The same is true when dealing with criminals or government traitors! The liberals in our government who have such lovely dreams of the future, simply can�t understand that you can�t legislate �equality� by law. That�s the main reason they have pushed their �integration programs.�
It is not to help the Blacks, or other Minority people, but to accomplish the �mongrelization of America!�You see, these men are also historians and know that history proves that whenever a people become �mongrelized� they are easier to control and are on their way to destruction.
Especially Roman, Greek, Egyptian and Babylonian history. Every great civilization that has existed in our 6,000 years of written history, has had to learn this lesson the �hard way.�
I have been wondering why, after all these years, why our young White girls were suddenly so attracted to the blacks, but I now know why this is happening. It is because God wishes it to be so. Listening to a tape from one of the preachers who send them to me, I heard him say something that literally blew my mind. So I looked it up and sure enough, what I heard was true.
As you know I believe that the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic and kindred people of the earth today are the True Children of Israel. And that I also believe that the black race, is the �Beast of the Field� as spoken of in the Scriptures; so taking this into consideration when we read the following it is obvious the mixing of the White and the Black races IS OF GOD.
Yes, the mixing of the White Israelites and the Negroes, who are the �Beast of the Field,� as spoken of in the scripture was prophesied by Jeremiah, as a sign of the last days of this age.
�Behold, the whirlwind of the Lord goeth forth with fury, a continuing whirlwind: it shall fall with pain upon the head of the wicked. The fierce anger of the Lord shall not return, until he have done it, and until he have performed the intents of his heart: in the latter days ye shall consider it. At the same time, saith the Lord, will I be the God of all the families of Israel, and they shall be my people. Thus saith the Lord, The people which were left of the sword (THE ISRAEL PEOPLE WHICH HAVE BEEN LEFT FROM THE MURDERS OF THE JEWS AND COMMUNISTS FOR THE PAST 200 YEARS) found grace in the wilderness; even Israel, when I went to cause him to rest (THE AMERICAN ISRAEL PEOPLE HAVE, REALLY, FOR THE MOST PART BEEN AT REST FROM WARS SUCH AS THEY EXPERIENCED IN DAYS GONE BY). The Lord hath appeared of old unto me, saying, Yea, I have loved thee with an everlasting love: therefore with loving kindness have I drawn thee...For there shall be a day, that the watchmen upon the mount Ephraim shall cry, Arise ye, and let us go up to Zion unto the Lord our God...Behold, I will bring them from the north country (Gog and Magog, Russia and China), and gather them from the coasts of the earth, and with them the blind and the lame, the woman with child and her that travaileth with child together: a great company shall return thither. They shall come with weeping, and with supplications will I lead them: I will cause them to walk by the rivers of waters in a straight way, wherein they shall not stumble: for I am a father to Israel, and Ephraim is my firstborn. Therefore they shall come and sing in the height of Zion, and shall flow together to the goodness of the Lord, for wheat, and for wine, and for oil, and for the young of the flock and of the herd: and their soul shall be as a watered garden; and they shall not sorrow any more at all (THE AMERICAN ISRAEL PEOPLE HAVE NOT GONE HUNGRY, SINCE THE LATTER DAY ISRAEL, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA HAS BEEN A NATION). Then shall the virgin rejoice in the dance, both young men and old together: for I will turn their mourning into joy, and will comfort them, and make them rejoice from their sorrow. And I will satiate the soul of the priests with fatness, and my people shall be satisfied with my goodness (THE AMERICAN ISRAEL PEOPLE DID HAVE VIRGINS REJOICING IN THEIR VIRGINITY AND THE MEN WERE GLAD FOR IT; THEY WERE FED TO THE FULL OF EVERYTHING THE EARTH HAD TO OFFER AND THEY WERE CERTAINLY SATISFIED WITH THE GOODNESS AND THE FATNESS OF THE LAND), saith the Lord. Thus saith the Lord; A voice was heard in Ramah, lamentation, and bitter weeping; Rachel weeping for her children refused to be comforted for her children, because they were not (CAN THERE BE ANY DOUBT THAT RACHEL HAS BEEN WEEPING FOR HER CHILDREN, FOR OVER 100-MILLION OF THEM HAVE BEEN MURDERED IN THE LAST CENTURY ALONE BY THE ANTICHRIST JEWS!). Thus saith the Lord; Refrain thy voice from weeping, and thine eyes from tears: for thy work shall be rewarded, saith the Lord; and they shall come again from the land of the enemy. And there is hope in thine end, saith the Lord, that thy children shall come again to their own border. I have surely heard Ephraim bemoaning himself thus; Thou hast chastised me, and I was chastised, as a bullock unaccustomed to the yoke: turn thou me, and I shall be turned; for thou art the Lord my God. Surely after that I was turned, I repented; and after that I was instructed, I smote upon my thigh: I was ashamed, yea, even confounded, because I did bear the reproach of my youth. Is Ephraim my dear son? is he a pleasant child? for since I spake against him, I do earnestly remember him still: therefore my bowels are troubled for him; I will surely have mercy upon him, saith the Lord. Set thee up waymarks, make thee high heaps: set thine heart toward the highway, even the way which thou wentest: turn again, O virgin of Israel, turn again to these thy cities (IN THE LAST 50 YEARS THE PEOPLE OF THE LAND HAVE BEEN MOVING MORE AND MORE TO THE CITY BECAUSE OF GOVERNMENT ACTIONS IN ITS NEVER ENDING EFFORTS TO DESTROY THE FARMER AND RANCHER). How long wilt thou go about, O thou backsliding daughter? for the Lord hath created a new thing in the earth, A woman shall compass a man (IN THIS DAY AND TIME WOMEN, CHILDREN AND ALIENS DO RULE OVER THE ISRAEL MEN). Thus saith the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel; As yet they shall use this speech in the land of Judah and in the cities thereof, when I shall bring again their captivity; The Lord bless thee, O habitation of justice, and mountain of holiness. And there shall dwell in Judah itself, and in all the cities thereof together, husbandmen, and they that go forth with flocks. For I have satiated the weary soul, and I have replenished every sorrowful soul. Upon this I awaked, and beheld; and my sleep was sweet unto me. Behold, THE DAYS COME, SAITH THE LORD, THAT I WILL SOW THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL AND THE HOUSE OF JUDAH WITH THE SEED OF MAN, AND WITH THE SEED OF BEAST (The Negroes).� [2]
It is an observable fact, that the aliens who have flocked illegally into America in the past thirty years, have become an albatross around our neck which is sinking us. They have not been a blessing to us.
During one period in the 19th Century, over 40-million immigrants flocked to these shores in the greatest immigration of all times. Almost 100% of them came from the White Christian nations of Europe. While their spoken language was not always the same, their heart�s language was. Their ideas concerning freedom, religion, morals, integrity, womanhood, the family and the work ethic, were very similar. Which is just what the Scriptures said the True Israelites would do: �Ephraim feedeth on wind, and followeth after the east wind: he daily increaseth lies and desolation; and they do make a covenant with the Assyrians, and oil is carried into Egypt.� [3]
But THE IMMIGRANTS WHO HAVE INUNDATED AMERICA IN THE LAST 50 YEARS, ARE FOR THE MOST PART, ALIEN TO EVERYTHING AMERICA STANDS FOR. THEY ARE HEATHEN IN CONCEPT, ANTI-CHRISTIAN IN RELIGIOUS BELIEF, THEY ARE PARASITES LIKE THE JEWS AND HAVE COME HERE ONLY TO LIVE OFF THE WHITE MAN, AND MOST HAVE COME FOR WHAT THEY CAN GET FROM OUR PEOPLE, AND NOT WHAT THEY CAN CONTRIBUTE TO THE COUNTRY. They have flocked into America by the millions, settling in large cities like New York, Los Angeles and Miami.
The reason the enemy wants to destroy farmers and small business, is that you are the �backbone of the nation; you are the blue that causes America to hang together; you are the people who made us great. You are the conscience of the nation.� Wake up to your responsibility! We do not advocate annihilation of everyone who disagrees with us. That�s not only un-Christian but ridiculous. But we have the right to say to the aliens in our midst. If you want to live in peace within our borders, as productive citizens, and enjoy the freedom and security you will find nowhere else, then dwell in peace. But when you begin to interfere with our Christian way of life; when you attack our Christian principles; when you tell us what we can and can�t teach our children in the public schools, or what Christian displays we may use on our Christian holidays, then you have outstayed your welcome and we have the right to ask you to depart. If you will not do so peacefully, then we should �throw them out.�
We are sure that many of our problems come from a lack of understanding of the basic principles of freedom, for although we are an educated people, that does not mean we are knowledgeable. Someone once truthfully said: �Education without God, turns men into clever devils.� And it often appears as though this is the goal of modern education. it certainly is not to develop Christian Americans.
We are inundated by men in position of responsibility, who are in the words of the Apostle Paul: �Ever learning, but never able to come to an understanding of the truth.� [4] According to Isaiah 56:10-11, the D.D. behind many preacher�s name could well stand for �Dumb Dog� instead of �Doctor of Divinity.�
There are several reasons behind this lack of understanding on the part of our people. One is that the leadership of America, under the apathy of it�s citizens, has sunk to a new low level. If you don�t believe this, look at the level of appointees that have been elevated to positions of responsibility within the Clinton Administration. They are top heavy with anti-Christians, non-Whites and sexual deviates.
It seems to us that our current crop of politicians in �le cesspolle Grande on the Potomac,� are more interested in promoting themselves than in the welfare of the country. As a result they will �sell out� to anyone who has the money, and are willing to pay for their Treason.
Second, our people as a whole, Christians foremost, have become mentally lazy and apathetic. It has become much easier to sit before the TV screen, or read a newspaper for our education, while you will find very few Christians who will look into the Bible for the answers.
When they come to a place that is difficult to understand, they trot to their Judeo-Christian minister, who tells them what he was taught in the seminary. Maybe it�s right, but many times it�s wrong. After all, we reason; the pastor is educated in the Scriptures. That�s why we pay him. We can trust what he says. Yet we neglect the Scriptures such as Jeremiah 23:22, which clearly indicates that if the pastors would �preach the whole counsel of God�s Word, the people would turn from their wicked ways.� This by no means has happened, which indicates to us that something is terribly wrong with the preaching coming from our churches.
As a result, our churches are turning out a crop of Alka Seltzer Christians, who come to church and �fizz� for an hour or two on Sunday, while the rest of the week they can�t be distinguished from the worldly crowd.
They are no doubt the Christians Jesus spoke about in Matthew 5:13, when He mentioned the �salt which had lost it�s savor.� It�s ability to act as salt and hold back corruption. Then too, the American people are continually attacked by an enemy strategy called �mis-information.� In the words of an old Arkansas hillbilly: �It ain�t from knowin� so much that causes the trouble; as it�s from knowin� so much that ain�t so.�
We should always remember that we will not lose our freedoms at 3 a.m. when there is a knock on the door and we open it to a man in a black Ninja Suit, with a hood covering his face with an automatic weapon in his harms, who says: �Come with me to the concentration camp.� We will lose it when people like you and I see things which are wrong in our local government, our schools, and our churches, and turn back to the TV saying: �I�m just an individual, you know, and everyone knows that you can�t buck city hall.� When enough of us fee that way, we will hold the funeral for freedom. We will take her to the cemetery and bury her, and over her grave erect a headstone with this epitaph: �America died! Because our Christian people didn�t want to be bothered!�
MASSACRES COMMITTED BY THE JEWS IN PALESTINE ‑ A PARTIAL LIST
Following are just a few of the many massacres committed by the Jewish/Zionists; specifically the Hagana, Irgun and Stern Gangs of Israel: The Massacre of ‑‑
1. King David Hotel, July 22, 1946;
2. Sharafat, Feb. 7, 1951;
3. Deir Yassin, April 10, 1948;
4. Falameh, April 2, 1951;
5. Naseruddine, April 14, 1948;
6. Quibya, Oct. 14, 1953;
7. Carmel, April 20, 1948;
8. Nahalin, March, 28, 1954;
9. Al‑Qabu, May 1, 1948;
10. Gaza, Feb. 28, 1955;
11. Beit Kiras, May 3, 1948;
12. Khan Yunis, May 31, 1955;
13. Beitkhoury, May 5, 1948;
14. Khan Yunis Again, Aug. 31, 1955;
15. Az‑Zaytoun, May 6, 1948;
16. Tiberia, Dec. 11, 1955;
17. Wadi Araba, May 13, 1950;
18. As‑Sabha, Nov. 2, 1955;
19. Gaza Again, April 5, 1956;
20. Houssan, Sept. 25, 1956;
21. Rafa, Aug. 16, 1956;
22. Qalqilyah, Oct. 10, 1956;
23. Ar‑Rahwa, Sept. 12, 1956;
24. Kahr Kassem, Oct. 29, 1956;
25.� Gharandal, Sept. 13, 1956;
26. Gaza Strip, Nov. 1956.
July 2, 1946: The King David Hotel in Jerusalem was bombed. Killing 91 people.
Menachem Begin, who was recently given the so‑called Nobel Peace Prize {It seems this prize is given to the people who can kill the most Christians and get away with it!}, and is the same Begin who planned the destruction of the King David Hotel and the massacre of Deir Yassin. Ex prime minister, Shamir, was originally a member of the Jewish terrorist gang called Irgun, which was headed by none other than Menachem Begin. Shamir later moved over to the even more radical �Stern Gang,� which committed many vicious atrocities.
Shamir himself has defended the various assassinations committed by the Irgun and Stern gangs on the grounds that �it was the only way we could operate, because we were so small. So it was more efficient and more moral to go for selected targets.� The selected moral targets in those early days of the founding of the state of Israel included bombing of the King David Hotel and the massacre of Deir Yassin.
April 9, 1948: A combined force of Irgun and Stern Gangs committed a brutal massacre of 260 Arab residents of the village of Deir Yassin. Most of whom were women and children. The Israeli hordes even attacked the dead to satisfy their bestial tendencies. In April, 1954, during Holy Week, and on the eve of Easter, The Christian cemeteries in Haifa were invaded, crosses broken down and trampled under the feet of these miscreants, and the tombs desecrated. The Israeli military conquest, therefore was made against a defenseless people, who had been softened up by such earlier massacres as Deir Yasin {250 Arabs; men, women and children were massacred there}.
The Jew, Weizman, referred to the massacre as this �miraculous simplification of our task� and Ben Gurion said �without Deir Yasin there would be no Israel.� Americans are not told that 10% of the Arabs killed by the Israeli�s in 1948 were Christian and that 10% of the Arab property confiscated belonged to Christians. Nor are they told the fact that Israel�s massacres and military actions forced 100,000 Christians to become refugees.
Accounts by Red Cross and United Nations observers who visited the scene, said that the houses were first set on fire and the occupants were shot down as they came out to escape the flames. One pregnant woman had her baby cut out of her stomach with a knife. Reminiscent of the acts committed by their brother Jews in Russia during and after the Bolshevik {Jewish} take over. The head of the International Red Cross delegation in Palestine, Jacques de Reynier, drove into the village and was met by a detachment of Irgun terrorists. In his report of the massacre the previous night, he wrote: �All of them were young, some even adolescents, men and women armed to the teeth: revolvers, machine‑guns, hand‑grenades, and knives, most of them still blood‑stained. A beautiful young girl with criminal eyes showed me hers {knife} still dripping with blood, she displayed it like a trophy.�
May 1948: The U.S. appointed Count Folke Bernadotte of Sweden to mediate between the Arabs and the Israelis. In his first progress report (of Sept. 16, 1948) he recommended that the U.N. should affirm �the right of the Arab refugees to return to their homes in Jewish controlled territory at the earliest possible date.� The Israelis responded in their own quiet way. The following day Bernadotte was murdered in Jerusalem.
The spectacular assassination which caused an International outcry was claimed, the, by an unknown �Fatherland Front,� but that was a cover for Shamir�s Stern Gang. Yoshua Zeitler and Meshlam Markover of Stern told Israeli Television earlier this year {1989} that, they respectively directed and led the operation that killed the Swedish diplomat and his French aid‑de‑camp. Zeitler, 71, said he decided to speak now because of fear that the U.N. and the �goyim� {non‑Jews} are again trying to force Israel into concessions.
February 1949: Israel launched an offensive across the Armistice lines with Egypt which brought its forces to the Gulf of Aqaba, occupying the Palestinian police post of Umm Rashrash which they afterwards named Eilat.
1950: Israelis seized the Al‑Uja de‑militarized zone on the Egyptian side and Baqqara on the Syrian side, expelling their Arab inhabitants and razed their homes to the ground by bulldozers.
1950‑1955: Israeli forces unleashed more than 40 acts of armed aggressions against Arab states, almost all causing a heavy loss of life. This included attacks and massacres in Qibya, Huleh 1953, Nahalin, Kfar Qassem in 1954, Gaza and a Syrian outpost on Lake Tiberias in 1955.
October 14‑15, 1953: Under the command of Ariel Sharon, Israeli squads attacked the unarmed Arab village of Qibya in the demilitarized one. Where they blew up 42 houses and killed more than sixty residents who were trapped inside. The details were so gruesome that the U.S. joined in a U.N. condemnation of the Israeli action, and for the first and only time, suspended aid to Israel in reprisal.
July 1954: Israeli intelligence planted �a ring of spies (Moles)� in Cairo, its task was to begin sabotage operations against selected Egyptian, British and American targets...On July 14, the Alexandria post office was fire‑bombed and the U.S. Information Agency offices in Cairo and Alexandria were damaged by fire started by phosphorous incendiary devices, as was a British‑owned theater.
Members of the spy ring were caught, and they confessed. They had been planted by Modin, the Israeli military intelligence organization. The purpose, presumably, was to sabotage Egyptian relations with the U.S. and Britain. Various commissions of inquiry into the affair conducted in Israel were never able to decide whether or not Israeli Defense Minister Pinchon Lavon authorized the operation.
1956: Squads of Israeli soldiers committed a hideous atrocity in the Palestinian village of Kafr Qasim, forty‑seven innocent people were shot down in cold blood. The careful and premeditated mass murders, never received great attention in the West. Although the Israeli courts convicted eight soldiers of murder, they were all released within two years of their trial, and within three years one of them who had been convicted of killing forty‑three Arabs in an hour, was engaged by the municipality of Ramleh as the �officer responsible for Arab affairs in the city.� In October 1956 Israel, backed by England and France, attacked Egypt to gain control of the Suez Canal.
Taking advantage of the situation created by Egypt�s decision of nationalization of the Suez Canal, Israel
joined forces with Britain and France to invade Egypt. As a result, it occupied the Sinai Peninsula, seized the
Gaza Strip, and Sharm Al sheikh which guarded the Strait of Tiran and the entrance to the Gulf of Aqaba. a year letter it withdrew reluctantly under the combined pressure of the U.N., U.S.A. and the Soviet Union.
There was no military necessity for this destruction; it was sheer vengeance against Arab Christians. This
action created another 300,000 Arab refugees, thus making a total refugee population of Christian and Muslin Arabs, which is larger than the combined populations of Montana, Nevada and Wyoming. It was during this campaign that the Israeli�s attacked the U.S.S. Liberty with the death of 34 of its number. If this had been an Egyptian or a Russian attack, American would have been at war, but the Jewish vote of America silenced any American criticisms of this action. Americans are also not told that Israel has always refused to obey any mandate of the United Nations. Resolutions affirmed by vote every year since 1948 recognize the right of the return of Palestinian refugees, but Israel always refuses to obey. Israel has been condemned over and over again for breaking the charter and now fulfilling the conditions upon which she was allowed to become a member!
1960‑1962: Israeli forces attacked Syrian villages on Lade Tiberias and brought death to hundreds of Arab civilians.
1966: Squads of Israeli soldiers raided the Jordanian village of Sammu, they killed 18 civilians, wounded 100 others and demolished 130 houses including a school, a clinic and a mosque.
1967: The U.S.S. Liberty was deliberately attacked in International Waters as it monitored communications during the Six‑Day War. Israel used U.S.‑donated equipment to jam the ship�s S.O.S., hoping to sink it and murder all aboard before word could get out. 34 sailors were butchered and 170 wounded in this blatant Act of War. The Liberty was part of the Sixth Fleet, a powerful group of men and ships paid for by U.S. Taxpayers to protect the Israeli�s. What do the Jews think of our American Service Men, the descendants of the men who pulled their chestnuts out of the fire in World War II? Read the following for Just a sample of the many murders of American military, the Jews have committed.
June 5, 1967: Israeli committed its biggest, most treacherous and premeditated aggression against Egypt, Syria and Jordan. After destroying Arab aircraft on the ground in a lightening attack, Israeli forces invaded and occupied the rest of Palestine i.e., the West Bank, Gaza Strip, East Jerusalem, the Syrian Golan Heights and the Egyptian Sinai Peninsula. In the first days of its aggression and in plain disregard of the truth, Israel fabricated a charge of aggression against its victims and presented it in a dramatic manner to the U.N. Security Council. Western media spread this fabricated story and the whole world sympathized with the supposed victim. In 1967 the Israeli�s made a third ruthless blitzkrieg attack upon the Arabs. This time they deliberately destroyed three quarters of a million dollar�s worth of church property.
The great deception practiced by Israel on the U.N. and the whole world is now completely discredited, the Israelis, therefore, changed their tactics and rely nowadays on the argument that, they were NOT attacked by Egypt, they were in danger of BEING attacked, and hence they resorted to a so‑called pre‑emptive strike. Alan Hart quotes a former Israeli Director of military intelligence as telling him �if Nasser had not given Israel the excuse to attack the Arabs, Israel would have invented a pretext for war within six or ten months� because its military planners had decided that the time had come to knock out vast amounts of mainly Soviet‑supplied Arab armor. Yitzhak Rabin, who as chief of staff planned this attack told Le Monde in February 1968, quite simply: �We knew that Nasser did not intend to attack.�
February 15, 1968: Israel invaded PLO bases in Karamah, on the eastern bank of the River Jordan with helicopter‑borne troops and tanks. Three hundred commandos fought off 1,500 Israeli soldiers and force them to retreat. The battle lasted all day and into the evening. Although the village was totally destroyed, the Palestinian defenders repelled the Israelis and inflicted heavy casualties among the invaders. By the Israeli account, they lost 28 soldiers and 90 were wounded.
1969: The Israelis distinguished themselves by committing a horrible crime, in retaliation of attrition war across the Suez Canal, Israeli war planes raided an Egyptian school �Bahr al Baker� in southern Egypt killing 75 children and wounding over 100.
August 1969: An Israeli set fire to one of the most sacred Islamic shrines. Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem, causing extensive damage to it. This crime plunged over one billion Muslims throughout the world into the deepest anguish.
March 12, 1970: Israeli forces invaded part of South Lebanon known as �Fatah‑Land� killing a number of Palestinian and Lebanese civilians.
September 8, 1972: Without any apparent cause or reason, Israeli Phantoms bombed Palestinian targets in Lebanon and Syria in a series of raids killing hundreds of civilians. This action was explained by the Israeli prime minister the next day, who in the Knesset, that �Israel had now adopted a new policy to strike at the terrorist organizations where ever we can reach them.�
February 21, 1973: Israel landed commando units on the coasts of the northern Lebanese city of Tripoli. They attacked two Palestinian refugees camps, dynamited several houses and buildings, some over the heads of their occupants, killing 35 refugees and wounding a similar number. On the same day, Israeli war planes shot down a Libyan Civilian Aircraft over the Sinai Desert killing� over 100 passengers.
April 10, 1973: Israeli commando units with the help of some Lebanese collaborators stormed into a residential quarter in East Beirut and killed three PLO leaders: Yusef Al Najjar, Kamal Adwan and Kamal Nasser.
1974: Israeli air‑borne commando units attacked Beirut airport and destroyed 13 Lebanese civilian aircraft on the ground.
In the same year, Israeli planes intercepted a civilian Syrian aircraft and forced it to land at Lydda (Lod) airport on suspicion that it was carrying a Palestinian commando leader. Christian shrines in Jerusalem were subjected to several acts of aggression and robbery. This included damaging the church of the Holy Sepulcher, burying 4 other Christian centers, and stealing the diamond Crown of the Virgin Mary {An not a peep from so‑called American Ministers!}.
1975‑1980: Israeli�s intelligence service, the Mossad, distinguished itself by feats of terrorist actions that killed a number of Arab and Palestinian diplomats, scientists and journalists such as the PLO representatives in London, Rome, Paris and Brussels, prominent Palestinian journalist and writer Ghassan Kanafani and the Egyptian nuclear scientist Dr. Al Mashad.
1981: Putting their so‑called pre‑emptive policy in action, Israeli warplanes raided and destroyed a peaceful Iraqi nuclear reactor near Baghdad.
June 6, 1982: The Israeli armed forces invaded Lebanon. Less than two weeks after its election, the New Menachem Begin government unleashed the first blow in its war to liquidate the PLO in Lebanon.
June 1982: Israeli forced launched their savage invasion of Lebanon. As a result of this invasion a great number of refugee camps, Lebanese towns and villages were destroyed. Israeli warplanes launched eight raids on Palestinian targets in South Lebanon and Beirut, killing nearly one thousand people and wounding many others. The fantasy of the �pre‑emptive strike policy� was dropped and even the Jerusalem Post correspondent was at pains to explain the purpose of the bombing raids. �The past few days of activities on the northern border followed five weeks of quiet. It is not know what triggered Israeli�s Friday afternoon raid.� Outraged by Israel�s onslaught and the cruel destruction of Beirut, Jewish journalist Jacobo Timmerman called Begin �unbalanced� a �terrorist� and �a disgrace to the people.� He accused Sharon of helping to make Israel �the Prussia of the Middle East.�
July 17, 1982: U.S. supplied F‑4 and F‑5 jets swooped low over Beirut in 4 passes, bombing the densely‑populated Fakahani district. Five tall apartment buildings were destroyed, 200 people were killed and 800 wounded. Forty percent of the victims were small children, and one of the survivors was an unborn baby pulled by doctors from the dead mother�s womb. Israel�s then Chief‑of‑staff Rafael Eitan announced on Israeli Radio that civilian causalities were unimportant and that the Arab causalities suffered as of the July 17 attack did not yet constitute the Israeli �final solution.�
September 1982: Israeli raids and bombardments continued during the weeks following the raid on Beirut in July. It was the beginning of the invasion of Beirut; after which an 80 days war led by Ariel Sharon, (then War Minister of Israel) resulted in the destruction of much of Beirut, killing and wounding thousands of Palestinians and Lebanese civilians. It was during this invasion that the massacre of the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps was committed. Where over 2,500 Palestinian women, children and elderly people were slaughtered in cold blood. Even the Israeli high court held a number of the Israeli military officers, including Sharon, responsible.
October 1982: Israeli terrorists bombed the houses, cars and offices of three elected Palestinian mayors on the West Bank, Nablus, Ramallah and Al Beireh.
1984: Israeli warships and gunboats intercepted merchant ships on the high seas off the coast of Lebanon and kidnaped a number of Palestinians.
1985: Israeli planes raided and destroyed the PLO headquarters in Tunis.
1986: Israeli secret agents assassinated a noted Palestinian cartoonist Naji Al Ali, in London.
April 1988: Israeli commando units stormed into the house of Khalil Al Wazir, in Tunis. Al Wazir who was the most senior PLO military commander and believed to be in charge of the Intifada, was murdered while sleeping.
February and March 1989: Israeli F‑16 planes pounded Palestinian targets in Lebanon�s Shouf Mountains, Damour and the Beka�s valley with a series of raids killing a numbers of civilians, including 15 school children in Damour.
April 14, 1989: Israeli border guards and settlers attacked the peaceful and unarmed village of Nahalin near Bethlehem. Eight Palestinians were massacred for no reason and over 50 were injured. The killings took place late in the night and at the beginning of the Holy month of Ramadan.
Could this sort of actions by the Jews be the reason they have been run out of every country on earth, except the United� States and there is not much doubt that some day America will realize just how much the Jews despise and loth them; and they too will rise up and drive them out. Expulsions of Jews from Host Nations: 1). A.D. 250, Carthage; 2). 415, Alexandria; 3). 554, Diocese of Clement (France); 4). 561, Diocese of Uzzes (France); 5). 612, Visigoth Spain; 6). 642, Visigoth Empire; 7). 855, Italy; 8). 876, Sens; 9). 1012, Mayence; 10). 1181, France; 11). 1290, England; 12). 1306, France; 13). 1348, Switzerland; 14). 1349, Hielbronn (Germany); 15). 1349, Hungary; 16). 1388, Strasbourg; 17). 1394, Germany; 18). 1394, France; 19). 1422, Austria; 20). 1424, Fribourg & Zurich; 21). 1426, Cologne; 22). 1432, Savory; 23). 1438, Mainz; 24). 1439, Augsburg; 25). 1446, Bavaria; 26). 1453, Franconis; 27). 1453, Breslau; 28). 1454, Wurzburg; 29). 1485, Vincenza (Italy); 30). 1492, Spain; 31). 1495, Lithuania; 32). 1497, Portugal; 33). 1499, Germany; 34). 1514, Strasbourg; 35). 1519, Regensburg; 36). 1540, Naples; 37). 1542, Bohemia; 38). 1550, Genoa; 39). 1551, Bavaria; 40). 1555, Pesaro; 41). 1559, Austria; 42). 1561, Prague; 43). 1567, Wurzburg, Genoese Republic; 44). 1569, Papal States; 45). 1571, Brandenburg; 46). 1582, Netherlands; 47). 1593, Brandenburg, Austria; 48). 1597, Cremona, Pavia & Lodi; 49). 1614, Frankfort; 50). 1615, Worms; 51). 1619, Kiev; 52). 1649, Ukraine; 53). 1654, LittleRussia; 54). 1656, Lithuania; 55). 1669, Oran (North Africa); 56). 1670, Vienna; 57). 1712, Sandomir; 58). 1727, Russia; 59). 1738, Wurtemburg; 60). 1740, LittleRussia; 61). 1744, Bohemia; 62). 1744, Livonia; 63). 1745, Moravia; 64). 1753, Kovad (Lithuania); 65). 1761, Bordeaux; 66). 1772, Jews deported to the Pale of Settlement (Russia); 67). 1775, Warsaw; 68). 1789, Alace; 69). 1804, Villages in Russia; 70). 1808, Villages & Countrysides (Russia); 71). 1815, Lubeck & Bremen; 72). 1815, Franconia, Swabia & Bavaria; 73). 1820, Bremes; 74). 1843, Russian Border Austria & Prussia; 75). 1862, Area in the U.S. under Grant�s Jurisdiction; 76). 1866, Galatz, Romania; 77). 1919, Bavaria (foreign born Jews); 78). 1938-45, Nazi Controlled Areas; 79). 1948, Arab Countries.
The United Nations has time and again rebuked Israel for the violations of the laws of war and conquered territory. Time and again the U.N. commission on human rights has declared the actions of Israel in the occupied territories violate human rights and �constitute war crimes.� They specify Israel�s acts in the deportation. The decisive motivation for the settlement policy, given to the world, is based upon the so‑called �historic‑right� of the Jewish nation.
The basis for this belief, is in the permanent Jewish ties to �Eretz Israel� (the land of Israel), is the divine promise of God. No wonder that Menachem Begin called the territories �liberated� not �occupied.� Addressing a crowd at Kadoum Settlement, manned by Ghoush Emunim, Begin said: �Judea and Samaria are Israeli land, belonging to the Jewish people, settlement is right and we have a duty to continue to fulfill that right and duty.�
In addition to this supposed �historical right� the security argument forms the second important pillar of legitimacy for the Jewish settlements. According to the conception of Israeli politicians, the state still has no final �secure� border capable of defense. The new defense village settlements should help secure existing and possible future borders, in that they serve as the first military bulwark against possible Arab attacks.
Equally significant (to the settlements which have established an irrevocable condition) have been intimations from official quarters that Israel is planning to retain at least most, if not all, of the territories seized in 1967. This intention was clearly illustrated in a speech made by Mordechai Zippori, Israeli minister of energy, on October 10, 1982. The occasion was the opening ceremony of Inav, a new settlement, established on land seized from the villagers of Anabta, near Tulkarem.
Christians around the world have been deceived by their Judeo-Christian teachers that the Jews have a rightful claim to Palestine because it belongs to the descendants of the ancient Israelites. And stupidly await an attack on that little bastard country known today as Israel. But those who have studied history, know that the Russians have already invaded Palestine and conquered it! For the Jews that control Palestine today are the descendants of the Russian Khazars and are not the descendants of Abraham in any way. We know for two reasons that the Jews in Palestine today are not the rightful owners.
1). The Jews who control Palestine today are the descendants of the Khazars and can be proven by reading the following books: Under the heading of �A brief History of the Terms for Jew� in the 1980 Jewish Almanac is the following:
�Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an Ancient Israelite a �Jew� or to call a Contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew.� [5]
The World Book omits any reference to the Jews, but under the word Semite it states:
�Semite...Semites are those who speak Semitic languages. In this sense the ancient Hebrews, Assyrians, Phoenicians, and Cartaginians were Semites. The Arabs and some Ethiopians are modern Semitic‑speaking people. Modern Jews are often called Semites, but this name properly applies only to those who use the Hebrew Language. The Jews were once a sub‑type of the Mediterranean race, but they have mixed with other peoples until the name �Jew� has lost all Racial Meaning.�
The History of the Jewish Khazars, by D.M. Dunlop, pp. 4-15; Benjamin Freeman, Facts Are Facts; Encyclopedia Americana (1985); Encyclopedia Britannica (15th edition); Academic American Encyclopedia (1985); Encyclopedia Americana (1985); The Jewish Encyclopedia; The Encyclopedia Judaica (1972); The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia; The Bible relates that the Khazar (Ashkenaz) Jews were/are the sons of Japheth not Shem:
�Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood. The sons of Japheth...the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz...� [6]
So the Bible verifies that the Ashkenaz Jews [Khazars] are not the descendants of Shem and cannot be Semite.
The American People�s Encyclopedia for 1954 at 15‑292; Academic American Encyclopedia, Deluxe Library Edition, Volume 12, page 66; The New Encyclopedia Britannica, Volume 6, page 836; Collier�s Encyclopedia, Volume 14, page 65; New Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume VIII, page 173; The Cadillac Modern Encyclopedia, page 822; The Jewish Encyclopedia for 1925; The Jewish author, Arthur Koestler, In his 1976 best seller The Thirteenth Tribe; The Outline of History; Jewish author Alfred M. Lilienthal, in The Zionist Connection II, pages 759‑768; Antiquities of the Jews, by Josephus, Book 13, ch. 9, sec. 1; Israel in Bible Prophecy; Palestine is Coming; The Conquest of A Continent, by Madison Grant, pp. 224-225; The Iron Curtain Over America, By John Beaty, pp. 15-16. And there are many more but space prohibits.
�������������������� The Non History of The Blacks
The record of Blacks in South Africa, who have been ruling that country since their President DeKlerk betrayed his people, has been so appalling that even Mrs. DeKlerk, the wife of the treacherous deputy president, that she has been quoted as saying, �The Blacks are not capable of ruling a country.� Which is demonstrably true, but the reason is not, as the liberals would claim, a lack of education or an unfavorable environment. It is purely and simply a matter of mental inadequacy.
As W.G. Simpson has pointed out in his book, �Which Way, Western Man?� the Negro has never developed a significant culture anywhere, at any time. Tom Anderson sums up Black history: �Despite what you have been told, Negro history has not been obliterated. There wasn�t any. During the past 5,000 years, the history of Black Africa is blank. Not just here. Everywhere.
UNTIL THE WHITE RACE ARRIVED, THERE WAS NO LITERATE CIVILIZATION SOUTH OF THE SAHARA. THE BLACK AFRICAN HAD NOT INVENTED A PLOUGH; A WHEEL; DOMESTICATED AN ANIMAL; OR A CROP. HE HAD NO WRITTEN LANGUAGE; NO LITERATURE WHATEVER; NO NUMERALS OR CALENDAR; OR SYSTEM OF MEASUREMENTS; HE HAD NOT INVENTED A BED; A TABLE; A SPOON; A FORK; A TABLE; A CHEST OF DRAWERS; BUILT A HOUSE; DUG A WELL; INVENTED A PUMP TO PUMP WATER; A WHEEL; A KITCHEN CABNET; LEARNED HOW TO WEAVE CLOTH; NO INVENTIONS OF ANY KIND EXCEPT THE THROWING SPEAR, AND A CRUDE KNIFE.
The reason for this is purely biological and the proof has been given by scientists who have examined the brains of Africans and found that the supregranular layer of the frontal cortex is about 14% thinner than that of the White man. That is the area of the brain that is concerned with will, intellect, self-control and the capacity to maintain and create a civilization. It controls the ability to organize, plan and execute the elements that produce a stable government, a healthy economy and fiscal responsibility.
In has also been observed that when the Blacks are exposed to a higher culture over a period of time, they generally lagged behind the general level and their contributions have been few and of secondary order. Judging by the immediate results in the Republic of South Africa, we would say that the contribution of the Blacks has been decidedly retroactive.
Of course, race mixing has long been an obsession of the Jews and is promoted throughout the Western world, in their never ending efforts to destroy our Israelite people. Most of Europe and England are suffering along with America from this assault by the Jews and their colored hordes. The expected result of this general and official policy is mongrelization because a mongrelized population is easier to control.
In his book, Mr. Sparks claims that under Mandela�s leadership, the ANC came to power without any outside help! He has the unmitigated gall to compare the ANC Blacks with the heroes of the American revolution in their struggle for independence. He praises the White and the Jewish collaborators as ardent patriots who lead a multi-cultural vanguard which will become an example of racial harmony for the rest of the African continent! It takes one�s breath away, at the audacity of the man.
The question persists, however; How could a stable, prosperous and highly industrialized country such as South Africa vote itself voluntarily into Black rule? The answer is that it didn�t. It was irresistible force from the outside that compelled its surrender. In South Africa the well-informed agree that this pressure came from the U.S. State Department. It can be added that the force behind that pressure was Jewish; it was allied by the same Jews who have penetrated every aspect of our lives during this century.
The two men chosen for this despicable job were Herman Cohen and Chester Crocker, with Henry Kissinger and Lord� Carrington; lurking in the background. Kissinger, Carrington and Crocker had been instrumental in turning the gallant little nation of Rhodesia over to Black Communist rule in 1980.
Crocker had, behind his poncy, Foggy Bottom mustache, sneered at the murdered AWB men as they lay in pools of their own blood, calling them �barbecue commandoes.�
He knew how close it had been, how his carefully laid plans could have come unstick if the Whites� planning had been just a little better in Bophuthatswana. His hatred for Whites is total. Chester Crocker is a caricature of our Jewish/homosexual; run Department of State.
After Rhodesia, the South Africans knew what America (Jews) wanted. America wanted South African Whites to die. The two massive military airfields in Botswana, the fortress of a U.S. embassy in Pretoria, CIA spies everywhere-added to the saturation bombing of Iraq (for what?) the message was clear.
The country itself had been softened up by two decades of Judaic demoralization in government and the church and the media. There was no other country to which South Africa could turn. It was made to appear pointless to resist. The masters of deceit had won again in a relatively bloodless takeover, if you discount the thousands of Africans who had been slaughtered. The once strong, brave Whites lost little blood but nevertheless voted for their own destruction.
Now it�s our turn, will we Americans do the same thing? Maybe not, since there are so many more of us and among these great numbers are those who have learned from others� mistakes. Americans, too, are different from White South Africans in that we have become pretty disenchanted and cynical with regard to our government. And above all, Jews fear American opinion. The Jews know that if Americans ever turn on them it will be much worse for them than what actually happened to Jews during World War II, and we are not talking about the great HoloHoax, which is pure Jewish fantasy to allow them to steal billions of dollars from Germany.
We must go back in history to understand how this Jewish problem came about. Most Jews with whom we are confronted today are Ashkenazim. They or their parents or grandparents come not from Palestine but from Russia, Poland and Lithuania. They are not Semitic but rather Oriental. They were originally known as Khazars. The Khazars ruled a large kingdom in southern Russia in the eighth century. The Khazars were a mixed breed of Turk and nomadic Asiatic� tribes, first appearing about the middle of the fifth century as a people under Hunnish sovereignty and were regarded, together with the Magyars and other tribes, as a later offspring of Attila�s horde.
|
|
The Khazars were originally pagan and were confronted by the great Muslim onslaught as well as by the Eastern Roman Empire in Byzantium. They were pressured by both to convert to Islam and Christianity respectively and actually did both for brief periods before finally converting to Judaism around A.D. 70. According to the Jewish version, the king summoned representatives of both the Roman Emperor and the Caliph of Baghdad and heard their arguments for conversion. The king had the inevitable Jewish advisor, who suggested ask the Christian, �Who is closer to your belief, the Jew or the Muslim?� (AND OF COURSE THE CHRISTIAN KNOWING NOTHING OF THE JEWISH RELIGION) said, �The Jew.� He did the same with the Muslim, who also answered, �The Jew.� The king then announced his kingdom�s conversion to Judaism. This was believed to have been a neutralist, diplomatic maneuver! The Arab version is similar except the Muslim never got to answer the question. In this version, the Jewish advisor had the Muslim representative poisoned before he could see the King. (For a close look at this perplexing question of Jewish identity, see Arthur Koestler, �The Thirteenth Tribe,� New York, 1976 and �Khazars,� Encyclopedia Britannica).
The kingdom of Khazaria was almost all-powerful in its region north of the Caucasus Mountains, Between the Black Sea and Caspian Sea. Then Khazaria was defeated by the invading Varangians (Israelites), a Scandinavian people, and many of the Khazars fled westward. (The kingdom was finally erased by Genghis Khan�s Golden Horde in the middle of the thirteenth century).
The Jewish refugees from Khazaria settled mainly in what is now Poland and Lithuania. As a wandering tribe they found hospitality among the European nations and were welcomed in England. They became known simply as Jews, taken somewhat mistakenly from the tribe of Judah. They fit the self-absorbed, self-destructive identity of the Old Testament people but they are truly a Talmudic people from Western Asia.
The Jews soon became a hated people wherever they went and not only for their practice of usury. A PERSISTENT ACCUSATION IN EVERY COUNTRY WHEREIN THEY SETTLED WAS THAT THEY HAD A RITUAL OF SLAUGHTERING CHRISTIAN CHILDREN AND DRAINING THEIR BLOOD AS AN INGREDIENT IN THEIR �RELIGIOUS� RITUALS. THE WERE ACCUSED OF DELIBERATELY POISONING WELLS WITH PLAGUE-INFESTED CORPSES AND THEREBY SPREADING THE GREAT BLACK DEATH IN 1348-1350 WHICH WIPED OUT ONE-THIRD TO TWO-THIRDS OF EUROPE�S POPULATION. (They certainly did poison wells during their Bolshevik seizure of power in Russia and their Zionist seizure of power in Palestine during World War II and the years following until 1948).
���� They were eventually expelled from every country in Europe, including England;� Except the United States and there is not much doubt that some day America will realize just how much the Jews despise and loth them; and they too will rise up and drive them out. Expulsions of Jews from Host Nations: 1). A.D. 250, Carthage; 2). 415, Alexandria; 3). 554, Diocese of Clement (France); 4). 561, Diocese of Uzzes (France); 5). 612, Visigoth Spain; 6). 642, Visigoth Empire; 7). 855, Italy; 8). 876, Sens; 9). 1012, Mayence; 10). 1181, France; 11). 1290, England; 12). 1306, France; 13). 1348, Switzerland; 14). 1349, Hielbronn (Germany); 15). 1349, Hungary; 16). 1388, Strasbourg; 17). 1394, Germany; 18). 1394, France; 19). 1422, Austria; 20). 1424, Fribourg & Zurich; 21). 1426, Cologne; 22). 1432, Savory; 23). 1438, Mainz; 24). 1439, Augsburg; 25). 1446, Bavaria; 26). 1453, Franconis; 27). 1453, Breslau; 28). 1454, Wurzburg; 29). 1485, Vincenza (Italy); 30). 1492, Spain; 31). 1495, Lithuania; 32). 1497, Portugal; 33). 1499, Germany; 34). 1514, Strasbourg; 35). 1519, Regensburg; 36). 1540, Naples; 37). 1542, Bohemia; 38). 1550, Genoa; 39). 1551, Bavaria; 40). 1555, Pesaro; 41). 1559, Austria; 42). 1561, Prague; 43). 1567, Wurzburg, Genoese Republic; 44). 1569, Papal States; 45). 1571, Brandenburg; 46). 1582, Netherlands; 47). 1593, Brandenburg, Austria; 48). 1597, Cremona, Pavia & Lodi; 49). 1614, Frankfort; 50). 1615, Worms; 51). 1619, Kiev; 52). 1649, Ukraine; 53). 1654, LittleRussia; 54). 1656, Lithuania; 55). 1669, Oran (North Africa); 56). 1670, Vienna; 57). 1712, Sandomir; 58). 1727, Russia; 59). 1738, Wurtemburg; 60). 1740, LittleRussia; 61). 1744, Bohemia; 62). 1744, Livonia; 63). 1745, Moravia; 64). 1753, Kovad (Lithuania); 65). 1761, Bordeaux; 66). 1772, Jews deported to the Pale of Settlement (Russia); 67). 1775, Warsaw; 68). 1789, Alace; 69). 1804, Villages in Russia; 70). 1808, Villages & Countrysides (Russia); 71). 1815, Lubeck & Bremen; 72). 1815, Franconia, Swabia & Bavaria; 73). 1820, Bremes; 74). 1843, Russian Border Austria & Prussia; 75). 1862, Area in the U.S. under Grant�s Jurisdiction; 76). 1866, Galatz, Romania; 77). 1919, Bavaria (foreign born Jews); 78). 1938-45, Nazi Controlled Areas; 79). 1948, Arab Countries.
However, their ability to amass money, to manipulate loans to the warmongering leaders of the West who desperately needed funds for their adventures, brought them back into favor. The British were more obstinate but again, money prevailed when, in the sixteenth century, the Jews financed Cromwell on the conditions that the Jews who had eluded the mass deportation could stay and that more could move in.
Imperial Russia in 1792 confined most of her Jews, roughly five million of them, to an area stretching from Poland to Ukraine known as the Pale of Settlement. Approximately 200,000 privileged Jews were allowed to remain beyond the Pale.
The Diaspora (dispersed) Jews profited by their experiences until by the eighteenth century they were so well established that there was no longer, except in Russia, any danger of deportation. The Rothschild family, Amschel and his four sons, had prospered so mightily from their financial transactions with the needy governments, rulers and nobility that they could create revolutions and back both sides of the various political and religious wars that raged over Europe and England during that period.
The term �protocols� means in our discussion a draft of a plan of action by the Jewish leaders. There have been many such drafts at different periods in Jewish history since the dispersion, but few of them have gone into general circulation. One notorious example is the response to the chief rabbi of Spain by the Grand Sanhedrin in Constantinople in 1492, following the general expulsion of Jews by Ferdinand. The Grand Satraps and Rabbis issued (condensed) six-point protocol for Jews who wished to remain in Spain:
1). Convert to Christianity;
2). Become merchants and take the Christians� property from them;
3). Become doctors and apothecaries and kill Christians medically;
4). Become priests and destroy the Church from within;
5). Become lawyers, mix in affairs of State and by putting Christians under your yoke you may dominate the world and be avenged;
6). Do not swerve from this order and you will reach the actuality of power.
In the late eighteenth century a Jewish/Masonic blueprint for world government was discovered by the Bavarian police. This chance discovery led to the exposure and suppression of the Illuminati. Copies of these protocols were sent to Western Governments but were dismissed as extremist ravings. One wise American, Benjamin Franklin, working with his colleagues on framing the American Constitution, gave them a prophetic warning on the subject of the Jew.
His speech to the delegates at the convention was taken down by General Charles Pinckney, who kept a record of the speeches given by the delegates in his diary. This diary was on display at the Franklin Museum in Philadelphia until it mysteriously disappeared around the year 1900.
However, Mr. G.L.K. Smith has a letter from Mrs. M. Dingley, who says that she and her mother saw the Pinckney diary in the museum and they copied Franklin�s speech from it. This is the full text as published by Smith:
�For over 1700 years the Jews have been bewailing their sad fate in that they have been exiled form their homeland, as they call Palestine. But, gentlemen, did the world give it to them in fee simple they would find at once some cogent reason for not returning. Why? Because they are vampires and vampires cannot live on vampires. They cannot live only among themselves. They must subsist on Christians and other people not of their race.
�If you do not exclude them from these United States, in this Constitution, in less than 200 years they will have swarmed in such numbers that they will dominate and devour the land and change our form of government for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives, our substance, and jeopardized our liberty. �If you do not exclude them in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your graves.
�Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics. Let them be where they will or how they will or how many generations they have been away from Asia, they will never otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American�s, and will not even though they lie among us for ten generations. A leopard cannot change its spots. Jews are Asiatics, are a menace to this country if permitted entrance, and should be excluded by this Constitution.��
The twenty-four protocols which concern us now were obtained in the French language from the Jewish Freemasonic �Mizraim� Lodge in Paris in 1884, translated into Russian and delivered to General Cherevin, the Russian Interior Minister. Cherevin suppressed the documents until his death in 1896, when they were included in his memoirs and willed to Nicholas II.
In 1897 Jewish members of the Russian police obtained the alleged minutes of the Zionist Congress in Basle, Switzerland, chaired by Dr. Theodore Herzl that year. These minutes were found to correspond with the French protocols.
The Protocols as we know them are so terrible, so cruel and so convincing as to their origins that a reading of them creates fear and loathing of the obvious authors. Jewish spokesmen began immediately an attempt to discredit the documents as forgeries (forgeries of an original?) and then as a plagiarism of Maurice Joly�s 1865 anti-Napoleon book, �Dialogues aux Enfers entre Machiavelli et Montesquieu. The Jewish spin doctors neglected to mention that Joly based his book on an 1850 book by Jacob Venedey entitled, �Machiavelli, Montesquieu & Rousseau.� Joly and his Jewish friend, Venedey, were associated with Karl Marx, Adolphe Cremieux and other revolutionary Jewish Freemasons in the Alliance Israelite.
Both Joly�s and Venedey�s books can be traced to �The Prince by Machiavelli and L�Esprit des Lois� by Montesquieu. What difference does it make? If we were to conduct a campaign of resistance which was based on a novel such as �The Turner Diaries,� the only thing that mattered would be the physical actions of that campaign.
The fact that the campaign was based on the novel might be interesting-but only results count. The Protocols described not only results which the Jews had achieved up through the late nineteenth century but goals which they would accomplish twenty years later in Russia and then in Eastern and Central Europe. They also describe how Jews have seized control of life as we know it in the United States and the British Empire.
In Bolshevik Russia the penalty for �anti-Semitism� was death. Sergius Nilus, who originally published them in Russia in 1901, was arrested by the Bolsheviks, tortured and sent into internal exile where he died. To be in possession of the Protocols of Zion was to be shot on sight. This proves how revealing of the Jewish program are the Protocols, the program being an eventual world government with Jews in total power . To read them is to understand the enemy within.
The Jewish Question has been asked for centuries: Who is the Jew? How does he get into positions of power everywhere? Who puts him there? What does he do there? And there is also the great question of Jewish identity.
Koestler certainly explodes the myth of the Khazar/Ashkenaz Jews being the �Chosen People� of the Old Testament. Thanks to him, the tern �anti-Semitism� has lost its meaning and power. (Willie Martin, has gone a step further and used Jewish writings to trace them back to Japeth the third son of Noah) The artificial state of Israel, ruled by Ashkenaz Jews from Poland and Russia, is not just a nation of parasites- it is a fraud. With American and British complicity it usurped Palestine from the Palestinians and has waged military and psychological warfare against its Semitic neighbors unceasingly for fifty years. Israel is anti-Semitic!
But there is yet another question which Koestler does not answer with regard to the amazing similarity between Sephardic Jews and Ashkenaz Jews, who are in no way related. The Sephardic Jews are those who migrated from Judea to Spain and lived there for more than a thousand years until most were expelled in 1492, and those who pretended to convert; the Marranos.
Look at Bernard M. Baruch, the Jew who seized control of the American economy during and after World War I and then during World War II and beyond. (The Jew Dwight Eisenhower, in his memoirs, remarked, �The smartest thing I ever did was ask Bernard Baruch for advice on my military career in 1939") Baruch was a Sephardic Jew.
He was allowed first by someone and then by Congress to enrich himself while in government service almost beyond comprehension. He was an agent of the Sanhedrin which we see in the Old Testament, the New Testament, in Khazaria, Bavaria, the Southern Confederacy, right through to the office of every president, senator and congressman in this country�s modern history.
The actions of Baruch the Sephardic Jew are identical to those of Kissinger the Ashkenaz which are identical to those of Judah Benjamin the Sephardic. These are in turn identical to those of the hundreds of Ashkenazim whom Clinton has appointed to the highest positions in his administration.
The question remains: How could these strange people from Russia emulate; mimic exactly those same Edomite Jews who screamed, �Crucify him, crucify him!?� It is a puzzlement. They are linked by the Talmud, of course. This leads to the subjects of programming and reprogramming. If a Gentile can be programmed to be a Jew, can a Jew be reprogrammed to be a human being?
It is now 200 years since Franklin gave his prophetic warning and the Jews are in total control of our government and mass media. If someone doesn�t believe this, there is a simple test: Try to find an article critical of Jews in any establishment outlet. Try to find a television documentary which shows how the Jews got �confessions� out of Germans in the Nuremberg Trials. Try to find a discussion on the TV talk shows about the numbers of Jews in Clinton�s administration. Try to find a movie or television program or a novel which puts a Jew in the role of villain. Most fictional villains are blonde and blue-eyed.
As for our government, again, most of Clinton�s appointees to high office are Jews and/or homosexuals such as Janet Reno, the lesbian who gave the orders to incinerate Christian men, women and children in Waco, Texas. Their guilt? They were �supposed� to be harboring illegal weapons, though none was found by the ADL-directed federal thugs who carried out the murderous assault. This was government terrorism inconceivable in the America we used to know. Yet that is not really true because in 1932 the following took place in Washington, D.C.
You say it can�t happen here! Well it has already happened in America. The following article written by Neal Knox and published in Guns & Ammo Magazine, September 1989 issue, p. 32:
�It was clear that all the government had to do was wait. The multitudes of demonstrators in the immense government square had shrunk to a few thousand, and more were drifting away every day. But the hardliners were determined that the demonstrators shouldn�t escape unscathed; such protests could lead to open rebellion and violent revolution‑like the one that had created the present government. With the heads of government divided and wavering, the Army decided to act. Obeying the orders of the president, the commanding general of the army lined up his forces facing the demonstrators and ordered them to disperse. The demonstrators didn�t think the Army would attack. It did. Tanks rolled into and across the demonstrators� ramshackle huts. Marching soldiers with fixed bayonets and assault rifles and tear gas followed the tanks, clubbing, bayoneting and shooting those assembled.
���� The Army later said the demonstrators rioted; the general claimed armed soldiers were attacked. Many of the demonstrators were wounded; the number who died will never be known ‑ the government claimed it was only one. The commanding general declared that the demonstrators were driven by �the essence of revolution,� and that it was �beyond the shadow of a doubt� that the demonstrators had been about to seize control of the government.
���� The commander was Gen. Douglas MacArthur.
���� The place was Washington, D.C., not Beijing.
���� The date was 1932, not 1989.
���� The �assault rifles� were bolt‑action Springfield Model 1903s, not AK‑47s. The peaceful demonstrators weren�t students in Tiananmen Square demanding the equivalent of our First Amendment rights of freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and the right to petition the government for grievances. The demonstrators on the Washington mall and nearby Anacostia already had those rights; their problem was that they used them. They were Americans ‑ World War I veterans, thrown out of work by the Great Depression (created by the Federal Reserve), lobbying for government to immediately pay their promised Veteran�s Bonus.
���� No, the attack on the Bonus Marchers, bad as it was, wasn�t the brutal mass murder unleashed upon the students in Beijing. The American people wouldn�t have tolerated it ‑ and had the means to stop it. What happened at Tiananmen Square was the kind of ruthless tyranny that has occurred in other lands throughout history, and is precisely what the Founding Fathers feared might be done by the powerful central government they were creating under the United States Constitution.
That�s why the people refused to ratify that Constitution until it was amended to guarantee certain individual freedoms known today as the Bill of Rights. That�s why the First Amendment guarantees of speech, assembly and petitioning the government were backed up by the Second Amendment guarantee that the right of the people to keep and bear arms was not to be infringed.
And when, during debate on the amendment, some senators attempted to limit the right to apply only to �the common defense� which is what some people today say it is, the Senate rejected it. That piece of �legislative history� clearly shows that the Second Amendment was intended to be an individual right; not merely a �collective right� of states to have militia. But don�t tell me it can�t happen here ‑‑ because it has already happened here!�
Reno labeled them a dangerous religious cult that abused children. Reno burned the children to keep them from being abused, and we now know that the abuse charges were fabricated. CBS News reported through a �Sunday Morning� producer named Bernstein that thanks to modern computers it is now possible to interpolate segments of the tattered Dead Sea Scrolls. It is also now possible to interpret other obscured writings, such as those on a fifteen-inch pear, shaped stone obelisk found in Jordan.
This has resulted in a �bombshell,� according to the Bernstein report. Until now it was believed that �Moloch� was an ancient, evil Hebrew god who demanded the sacrifice of children by burning them. The computer-aided translation has revealed that �Moloch� was Not a Hebrew god but was rather the Hebrew word for the Hebrew practice of sacrificing their first-born children for �religious reasons.� The Jews interviewed by CBS were concerned that among other things, the story of the Passover must be re-examined.
The Davidian sect�s real crime was that they had been falsely flying the Star of David and converting Jews to their form of Christianity. The citizens of Waco found the members to be peaceful and cooperative. The Judaic cult to which Janet Reno pays allegiance exhorts its members to leave nothing alive following a successful attack on an enemy.
Is this an ancient, outdated command, no longer in vogue? What abut Eisenhower�s conduct of World War II and its aftermath? The deliberate starvation of 1 million German solders, and operation Keelhaul which sent thousands of Polish, Russian, and other citizens back to Russia to be burned in cattle cars, and sent to Siberia for slave labor. What about the attack by the Jews on Deir Yassin, Palestine? They left nothing alive that breathed, all the dogs, cats, pigs, goats, cattle; everything breathing was killed! That was in 1948. That was when the Palestinians fled Palestine. They recognized the Talmudic exhortation, and that they could expect no help from the English or the Americans.
The same Judaic FBI killer team that burned the Waco church and its members were fresh from another Talmudic operation in Idaho. First the family dog and little boy were shot and killed form behind by U.S. marshals who were directed by Jewish government psychiatrists. Then professional FBI assassin were brought in to finish the job. All adults were to be shot by the assassin, one of which was the mother holding her nursing infant daughter. She died quickly with a bullet through the head. The men were lucky to survive their wounds.
Their crime? They believed in apartheid, the separation from the Judaized America. The husband had sold two shotguns with barrels technically shorter than �the law� allows. For this the whole family was slated for death by bullets and/or fire. The death squad attempted to drop Diesel fuel from a helicopter and incinerate them in their remote mountain cabin but there were just too many witnesses. The husband was eventually acquitted in a multi-million dollar federal trial and awarded over three million dollars for his troubles.
If, two or three generations ago, one had tried to tell this true story of Randy Weaver they would have been taken to the nearest asylum. The stark truth is that we are not the same people we were two or three generations ago. We are a wishy washy, unthinking herd of sheep that sit in front of our television sets and watch people shoot each other and blow up buildings and cars in beautiful clouds of flame and smoke or we listen to solemn pundits earnestly discussing the present situation but carefully avoiding the fact. The Jews call us goyim; cattle. We�re the cows and they�re the cowboys. Our main interests seem to be our jobs, our investments and our plans for retirement usually in a remote area well away from the rat race that earning a living has become these days.
Americans are about to join South Africa and other victim nations in the New World Order, or Jewish World Government. What it amounts to is the brutally dictatorial money oligarchy run by Jews and the aggregations of capital invested in multi-national companies and oil interests. Preparations have already been made to deal with potential dissidents, along the lines of Waco and those measures employed by Israelis against Palestinians.
The only thing that stands between us and them is the emergence of the militia movement made up of men who are grimly determined to resist our ultimate Judaization. Many of them don�t even k ow whom they are resisting! Many of these brave men would be shocked to find that they are preparing to fight the forces of a dreadful future at the behest of Almighty God against such as that which has engulfed South Africa, guided by a frightening document known as the Protocols of the Meeting of the Learned Elders of Zion.
The Jewish enemy can be defeated.
First, fall on your knees and cry out to God for forgiveness of your sins, repent and seek Him in all your actions, and be Baptized for the remission of your sins, and then read the Protocols.
Second speak out and inform others. Remain calm but understand the gravity of our situation and make others understand it, too.
Third, always think in terms of victory over evil rather than in terms of defeat. The Jews wage psychological warfare and that depends on our ignorance of their goals. Study the Protocols and the Jews will be disarmed. As long as we are knowledgeable, alert, worship God in truth and righteousness, remain alert and mentally tough, we cannot be defeated for God will save us.
[1] 1 Timothy 5:8.
[2] Jeremiah 30:23-24; 31:1-27.
[3] Hosea 12:1.
[4] 1 Timothy 3:7.
[5] 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3.
[6] Genesis 10:1‑3.
